An argument in favor of using bio warfare

Home 8 Pros and Cons of Biological Warfare 8 Pros and Cons of Biological Warfare Also known as germ warfare, biological warfare is the use of infectious agents or biological toxins to incapacitate or kill humans, plants or animals. The toxins can be anything from viruses, bacteria and fungi. Proponents of biological warfare claim it provides tactical and strategic advantage.

An argument in favor of using bio warfare

Inthe bodies of Mongol warriors of the Golden Horde who had died of plague were thrown over the walls of the besieged Crimean city of Kaffa. Specialists disagree over whether this operation may have been responsible for the spread of the Black Death into Europe, Near East and North Africa, resulting in the killing of approximately 25 million Europeans.

The spread of the disease weakened the natives' resistance to the British troops led by Henry Bouquet.

An argument in favor of using bio warfare

It is not clear, however, whether the smallpox was a result of the Fort Pitt incident or the virus was already present among the Delaware people. Biological sabotage—in the form of anthrax and glanders —was undertaken on behalf of the Imperial German government during World War I —with indifferent results.

Pros and Cons of Biological Warfare - Vision Launch

The research was championed by Winston Churchill and soon tularemiaanthraxbrucellosisand botulism toxins had been effectively weaponized. In particular, Gruinard Island in Scotland, was contaminated with anthrax during a series of extensive tests for the next 56 years.

Although the UK never offensively used the biological weapons it developed on its own, its program was the first to successfully weaponize a variety of deadly pathogens and bring them into industrial production. Soon there were facilities for the mass production of anthrax spores, brucellosisand botulism toxins, although the war was over before these weapons could be of much operational use.

Woah. We are flattered you shared our blog post!

This unit did research on BW, conducted often fatal human experiments on prisoners, and produced biological weapons for combat use. Biological weapons were used against both Chinese soldiers and civilians in several military campaigns. The plan was set to launch on 22 Septemberbut it was not executed because of Japan's surrender on 15 August The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention was signed by the US, UK, USSR and other nations, as a ban on "development, production and stockpiling of microbes or their poisonous products except in amounts necessary for protective and peaceful research" in However, the Soviet Union continued research and production of massive offensive biological weapons in a program called Biopreparatdespite having signed the convention.

Using an ever-increasing information base, BW designers of the future will have the capability to engineer agents that target biological processes, producing a wide range of effects including. Arguments against the use of biological warfare: You might still be recovering from the shock after evidencing the lack of content in my 'arguments in support of biological warfare' section. No, I have done my homework and you will be relieved to find that this section of arguments against the utilisation of bioweapons is much fuller in content. Oct 17,  · In Defense of Torture. By Sam Harris. I will now present an argument for the use of torture in rare circumstances. While many people have .

The cost of a biological weapon is estimated to be about 0. A major factor about biological warfare that attracts terrorists is that they can easily escape, before the government agencies or secret agencies have even started their investigation.

This is because the potential organism has incubation period of 3 to 7 days, after which the results begin to appear, thereby giving the terrorists a lead.

In this technique, a DNA sequence is cut off and replaced with a new sequence or code that codes for a particular protein or characteristic, which could potentially show up in the required organism.

Though this technique is a breakthrough and is commendable, it can cause serious issues and potential danger if used by people with wrong intentions.

Oct 17,  · In Defense of Torture. By Sam Harris. I will now present an argument for the use of torture in rare circumstances. While many people have . - Iraq develops an offensive biological weapons capability including anthrax, botulium toxin, and aflatoxin. How can biological weapons be defended against? Biological defense may be divided into the following categories: prevention, protection, detection, treatment, and decontamination. Prevention may take several forms. In the . Biological warfare, or “germ warfare,” is the “use of biological toxins or infectious agents (bacteria, viruses, and fungi) with the intent to kill or incapacitate humans.” Historically, the United States’ involvement in bacterial weaponry has been driven by competition and paranoia.

Concerns have emerged regarding Do-it-yourself biology research organizations due to their associated risk that a rogue amateur DIY researcher could attempt to develop dangerous bioweapons using genome editing technology.

The argument is that biological weapons cannot be controlled: An agent like smallpox or other airborne viruses would almost certainly spread worldwide and ultimately infect the user's home country.

However, this argument does not necessarily apply to bacteria. Thus only the target might be affected adversely. The weapon may be further used to bog down an advancing army making them more vulnerable to counterattack by the defending force. The international biological hazard symbol Ideal characteristics of a biological agent to be used as a weapon against humans are high infectivityhigh virulencenon-availability of vaccinesand availability of an effective and efficient delivery system.

Critical issues

Stability of the weaponized agent ability of the agent to retain its infectivity and virulence after a prolonged period of storage may also be desirable, particularly for military applications, and the ease of creating one is often considered.

Control of the spread of the agent may be another desired characteristic.Biological warfare, or “germ warfare,” is the “use of biological toxins or infectious agents (bacteria, viruses, and fungi) with the intent to kill or incapacitate humans.” Historically, the United States’ involvement in bacterial weaponry has been driven by competition and paranoia.

What are biological weapons? Biological warfare is the deliberate spreading of disease amongst humans, animals, and plants.

Recent Opinions

Biological weapons (BW) introduce a bacteria or virus into an environment for hostile purposes, that is not prepared to defend itself from the intruder. As a result, this agent can become very effective at killing plants.

Also referred to as germ warfare, biological warfare is defined as the use of biological toxins and infectious agents, including bacteria, viruses and fungi, which incapacitate or causes injuries to animals, plants and, of course, humans as an act of war. Also referred to as germ warfare, biological warfare is defined as the use of biological toxins and infectious agents, including bacteria, viruses and fungi, which incapacitate or causes injuries to animals, plants and, of course, humans as an act of war.

Using rhetorical questions as an attention-getting device in the introduction to your speech 12 can be an effective attention strategy "This is an ounce of cocaine, and this is an ounce of marijuana.

Arguments against the use of biological warfare: You might still be recovering from the shock after evidencing the lack of content in my 'arguments in support of biological warfare' section.

No, I have done my homework and you will be relieved to find that this section of arguments against the utilisation of bioweapons is much fuller in content.

Biological warfare - Wikipedia